Survey results by the city of Portland Oregon showed that less than 1% of the adult population would want to ride a bicycle in mixed traffic on a busy street. This increases the capacity of this street going south.
Going south, towards the Cahuenga Pass, there will be an additional lane added by way of the bicycle lane. Why would you take away a travel lane that has intersections that are operating at beyond capacity at peak hours and give it to a few people that ride bicycles? Yet, the reaction by a lot of people in this area is that this sounds like the city is lacking in common sense. This will make it perhaps faster and more convenient to reach the two subway stations that are on Lankershim Blvd. On Lankershim Blvd, from Chandler Blvd to Ventura Blvd, the city is proposing to take away one north bound through lane for motor vehicles to put in two bicycle lanes. Something very similar is proposed for bike lane installation in the city of LA. The HOV lanes have proven to decrease the level of congestion on freeways in the LA area. Afterall, why would you take lanes away on a congested freeway to devote them to what looks like a few vehicles? The idea for toll or HOV lanes is that this will discourage some people from driving in single occupancy vehicles. This must look like a idiotic idea to most people who drive on this freeway. The traffic volume in the ExpressLanes on the 10 on Monday morning was 99 percent of what it was on Monday, Feb.So the ratio of toll-free to toll-payers was 52 percent HOV 3+ carpoolers to 48 percent single occupant vehicles and carpools with two people. Sixty-seven percent of the private vehicles that used the ExpressLanes during the Monday morning peak period were carpools with three or more occupants or two-person carpools. However, two-person carpools pay a toll during the peak period.
The maximum thus far was $5.15 for the westbound 605.
0 kommentar(er)
